What to do with Africa? Yes, this includes “the West” too.

Emphasis added:

Africa For The Chinese.

To The Editor of The Times.

Sir, – In a few days Sir Bartle Frere will return to England, and public attention will be directed to the East Coast of Africa. I am desirous of availing myself of the opportunity to ventilate some speculations of my own, which you may, perhaps, consider of sufficient interest to deserve publication in the Times. My proposal is to make the encouragement of the Chinese settlements at one or more suitable places on the East Coast of Africai a part of our national policy, in the belief that the Chinese immigrants would not only maintain their position, but that they would multiply and their descendants supplant the inferior Negro race. I should expect the large part of the African seaboard, now sparsely occupied by lazy, palavering savages living under the nominal sovereignty of the Zanzibar, or Portugal, might in a few years be tenanted by industrious, order loving Chinese, living either as a semi-detached dependency of China, or else in perfect freedom under their own law. In the latter case their would be similar to that of the inhabitants of Liberia, in West Africa, the territory which was purchased 50 years ago and set apart as an independent State for the reception of freed negroes from America.

The opinion of the public on the real worth of the Negro race has halted between the extreme views which have been long and loudly proclaimed. It refuses to follow those of the early abolitionists, that all the barbarities in Africa are to be traced to the effects of a foreign slave trade, because travelers continually speak of similar barbarities existing in regions to which the slave trade has not penetrated. Captain Colomb has written a well-argued chapter on this matter, in his recent volume.ii On the other hand, the opinion of the present day repudiates the belief that the negro is an extremely inferior being, because there are notorious instances of negroes possessing high intelligence and culture, some of whom acquire large fortunes in commerce, and others become considerable men in other walks of life. The truth appears to be that individuals of the mental caliber I have just described are much more exceptional in the negro than in the Anglo-Saxon race,iii and that average negroes possess too little intellect, self-reliance, and self-control to make it possible for them to sustain the burden of any respectable form of civilization without a large measure of external guidance and support. The Chinaman is a being of another kind, who is endowed with a remarkable aptitude for a high material civilization. He is seen to the least advantage in his own country, where a temporary dark age still prevails, which has not sapped the genius of the race, though it has stunted the developed the of each member of it, by the rigid enforcement of an effete system of classical education which treats originality as a social crime. All the bad parts of his character, as his lying and servility, spring from timidity due to an education that has cowed him, and no treatment is better calculated to remedy that evil than location in a free settlement. The natural capacity of the Chinaman shows itself by the success with which, notwithstanding his timidity, he competes with strangers, wherever he may reside. The Chinese emigrants possess an extraordinary instinct for political and social organization;iv they contrive to establish for themselves a police and internal government, and they give no trouble to their rulers so long as they are left to manage those matters by themselves. They are good-tempered, frugal, industrious, saving, commercially inclined, and extraordinarily prolific. They thrive in all countries, the natives of the Southern provinces being perfectly able to labor and multiply in the hottest climates. Of all known varieties or mankind there is none so appropriate as the Chinaman to become the future occupant of the enormous regions which lie between the tropics, whose extent is far more vast than it appears, from the cramped manner in which those latitudes are pictured in the ordinary maps of the world. But take a globe and examine it, and consider the huge but poorly-peopled bulk of Africa, by whose side the areas of India and of China look insignificant, and think what a field lies there for the development of a suitable race. The Hindoo cannot fulfil the required conditions nearly as well as the Chinaman, for he is inferior to him in strength, industry, aptitude for saving, business habits, and prolific power. The Arab is little more than an eater up of other mens produce; he is a destroyer rather than a creator, and he is unprolific.

The history of the world tells a tale of the continual displacement of populations, each by a worthier successor, and humanity gains thereby. We ourselves are no descendents of the aborigines of Britain, and our colonists were invaders of the regions they now occupy as their lawful home. But the countries into which the Anglo-Saxon race can be transfused are restricted to those where the climate is temperate. The Tropics are not for us, to inhabit permanently; the greater part of Africa is the heritage of people differently constituted to ourselves. On that continent, as elsewhere, one population continually drives out another. Consider its history as it extends over successive centuries. We note how Arab, Tuarick, Fellatah, Negroes of uncounted varieties, Cadre, Hottentot surge and reel to and fro in the struggle for existence. It is into this free flight among all present that I wish to see a new competitor introduced-namely, the Chinaman. The gain would be immense to the whole civilized world if we were to out-breed and finally displace the negro, as completely as the latter has displaced the aborigines of the West Indies. The magnitude of the gain may be partly estimated by making the converse supposition namely, the loss that would ensue if China were somehow to be depopulated and restocked by negroes.

The pressure of population in China is enormous, and its outflow is great and increasing. There is no lack of material for a suitable immigration into Africa. I do not say that it would be possible at any moment to persuade communities of men and women from Southern China to establish themselves in Africa; but I am assured, by excellent authorities, that occasions of political disturbances frequently arise when it would be practicable to do so by the promise of a free, or nearly free, grant of land. The Chinese have a land hunger, as well as a love for petty traffic, and they would find a field in which to gratify both of these tastes on the East African Coast. There are many Chinese capitalists resident in foreign parts who might speculate in such a system and warmly encourage it. If once successfully started, it ought to maintain itself. The colonist could not starve; and when they began to succeed they would send money to their relatives to enable them to follow, just as they now do from the many other parts of the world where they are located. For these reasons it is probable that the streams of emigration from China have sufficient “head” to enable them to reach and overflow the coasts of Eastern Africa if they were watched and judiciously diverted in that direction.

I have finally to speak of the political effort necessary to secure a free right of occupancy and of settlement at suitable points on the coast. No very serious obstacle seems to stand in the way; certainly none was met with when Liberia was founded. It is probable that as the success of such an enterprise would be of equally great value to all nations commercially interested in those parts, no national jealousy would be excited by its promotion, and the necessary territory could be obtained with little difficulty and at a small cost, to be advanced in the first instance as a charge on the land and hereafter to be redeemed.

Francis Galtonv [June 5, 1873]

Sure enough, 150-odd years later, it’s all coming to fruition? And perhaps now we might finally be ready to  praise Sir Galton for being, well, spot on. Not that such a posthumous return to fame will do his nazi-besmeared reputation much good now, at least in the West. But in the East? Go figure that Galton’s contemporaries and intellectual successors in China (and Japan!)vi were never actually “bothered” by the idea that heredity matters in the first place. Yes, even in human stocks. And wouldja look at the difference today between the Back-On-Top-East and the Africanising-West, the latter of which spent the last few generations conveniently “forgetting” that nature matters quite a lot more than nurture.

But hey, don’t be so hard on yourself, those superiorly stocked East Asians had at least a 2`500 year civilisational head start on the West, which is why Ye Olde Europe (and its colonies in the Byzantinevii Americas) can only manage to organise itself occasionally and for short bursts of a couple hundred years at most, and often only for a few decades at a stretch,viii compared to some millennia for the East.

So let’s keep at it: taking nothing for granted, we have much work to do and scant few hours in each of our hearts with which to beat ploughshares into swords, and swords into ports.

  1. Hey, Galton might be a smidge is a more humane policy approach than just quarantining the endarkened continent. ↩
  2. The recent volume being Captain Philip Howard Colomb’s Slave-Catching in the Indian Ocean: A Record of Naval Experiences (1873). ↩
  3. Sir Galton lived in much headier days for the Anglo-Saxon race, which in the last century-and-a-half has, ironically, “regressed to the mean,” and is therefore now being “fixed” with an infusion of barbarian blood. This approach will certainly lend much-needed vitality to the West, but civilisation? No, I’m afraid that’s a different societal North Star entirely, one best solved by inviting if possible and bribing if necessary perhaps hundreds of thousands of East Asian teachers and managers to come to our shores, and giving them unlimited range to whip into shape the soft, unruly, but perhaps increasingly activated flesh of the corroded West. ↩
  4. This admiration for Chinese political and social organization was actually echoed even earlier by none less than Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716), who said:

    The condition of our affairs, slipping as we are into ever greater corruption, seems to be such that we need missionaries from the Chinese who might teach us the use and practice of natural religion, just as we have sent them teachers of revealed theology.

    This, nearly two full centuries before Galton. ↩

  5. Sir Francis Galton was half-cousin and frequent correspondent of none less than Sir Charles Darwin. Sir Galton is also credited with inventing digital printing electric telegraph, scientific fingerprinting, modern weather maps, discovering the anti-cyclone, founding the modern scientific study of differential psychology and human heredity, and formulating statistical concepts of correlation and regression. ↩
  6. Including Pan Guangdan (1899–1967), about whom we can usefully still learn from via Yuehtsen Juliette Chung from her December 2014 publication in Isis: A Journal of the History of Science Society entitled Better Science and Better Race?: Social Darwinism and Chinese Eugenics (archived):

    Pan identified the most useful eugenic social elements: an average or slightly above-average standard of intelligence, a robust physique, and moral decency, all of which largely conformed to upper-middle-class values. Although eugenics did not aim to reproduce genius or seek to establish some “desirable” uniform personality, it nonetheless targeted the germplasm and health improvements, susceptibility to epidemic diseases, elimination of physical and temperamental defects, creativity, resilience in the face of external stimulation, sensory receptivity, intelligence, and social coordination.

    Sounds reasonable enough, no? ↩

  7. London wasn’t Rome and DC isn’t Byzantium. Nope, nothing to see here folks!

    ↩

  8. The most recent burst of civilisational energy in the West was exceedingly short, being 1940-1965. ↩

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *